Anonymous | Login | 2024-08-24 20:43 EDT | ![]() |
Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
0001356 | PacketFence | core | public | 2012-01-05 09:24 | 2012-06-14 12:21 | |||
Reporter | maikel | |||||||
Assigned To | obilodeau | |||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always | |||
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | |||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||||
Product Version | 3.1.0 | |||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||
Summary | 0001356: packetfence 3.1 fails to start from RPM install | |||||||
Description | Use of uninitialized value $captive_portal[0] in pattern match (m//) at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/pfcmd/checkup.pm line 734 (0000001) | |||||||
Additional Information | Seems 3.1 rpm install on Centos 6 doesnt have patch yet availabe in the trunk around line 734 in new code is: # Apache PerlPostConfigRequire scripts *must* compile otherwise apache startup silently fails my @captive_portal = pf_run("perl -c $lib_dir/pf/web/captiveportal_modperl_require.pl 2>&1"); if ($captive_portal[0] !~ /syntax OK$/) { add_problem( $FATAL, "Apache will fail to start! $lib_dir/pf/web/captiveportal_modperl_require.pl doesn't compile" ); my $captive_portal is on 3.1 after the if statement in 3.2 its as listed above | |||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
fixed in git revision | ||||||||
fixed in mtn revision | ||||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||
![]() |
|
(0002515) obilodeau (reporter) 2012-01-05 19:51 |
I just double-checked the code repository and I don't see why you have a difference between 3.1 (trunk 2 weeks ago) and 3.2 (trunk built every night) there were no changes in the lib/pf/pfcmd/checkup.pm file since 3.1 release (last change is dec 14th before 3.1 was released). Can you post both files? Maybe there's a build issue with CentOS 6 although I would have expected our last deployments to highlight it. |
(0002518) maikel (reporter) 2012-01-06 13:50 |
I see it to. Strange, it might have been the new Centos 6.2 release An intern here installed it and i saw that difference after the groupinstall Currently that system is down. I can confirm the bug monday if it still exists. else close the bug monday after 6pmGMT |
(0002519) maikel (reporter) 2012-01-09 07:01 |
This can be closed The intern used the RHEL5 repo on centos 6 |
![]() |
|||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2012-01-05 09:24 | maikel | New Issue | |
2012-01-05 19:47 | obilodeau | Status | new => assigned |
2012-01-05 19:47 | obilodeau | Assigned To | => obilodeau |
2012-01-05 19:51 | obilodeau | Note Added: 0002515 | |
2012-01-05 19:51 | obilodeau | Status | assigned => feedback |
2012-01-06 13:50 | maikel | Note Added: 0002518 | |
2012-01-09 07:01 | maikel | Note Added: 0002519 | |
2012-01-09 08:36 | obilodeau | Status | feedback => resolved |
2012-01-09 08:36 | obilodeau | Resolution | open => no change required |
2012-06-14 12:21 | obilodeau | Status | resolved => closed |
Copyright © 2000 - 2012 MantisBT Group |