PacketFence - BTS - PacketFence |
View Issue Details |
|
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0001042 | PacketFence | core | public | 2010-07-28 13:03 | 2012-10-19 14:14 |
|
Reporter | obilodeau | |
Assigned To | | |
Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |
Platform | | OS | | OS Version | |
Product Version | 1.9.0 | |
Target Version | | Fixed in Version | | |
fixed in git revision | |
fixed in mtn revision | |
|
Summary | 0001042: autoreg in a category |
Description | The violation action autoreg would need to be augmented the ability to assign a category.
One thing I could think of is to change the syntax to: autoreg(phone) so it would assign the phone category on autoregistration.
I don't know how you feel about this suggestion though, maybe it's an opportunity to rethink autoregistration like we said many times. |
Steps To Reproduce | |
Additional Information | |
Tags | No tags attached. |
Relationships | related to | 0001026 | closed | obilodeau | PacketFence does not handle very well the AutoReg violation in some cases |
|
Attached Files | |
|
Issue History |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2010-07-28 13:03 | obilodeau | New Issue | |
2010-07-28 13:03 | obilodeau | Status | new => assigned |
2010-07-28 13:03 | obilodeau | Assigned To | => obilodeau |
2010-07-28 13:04 | obilodeau | Relationship added | related to 0001026 |
2010-09-22 16:02 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.2 => 1.9.3 |
2011-10-13 14:00 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.3 => +2 |
2012-02-29 10:53 | obilodeau | Category | feature => core |
2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0003187 | |
2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Status | assigned => resolved |
2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Resolution | open => fixed |
2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Assigned To | obilodeau => |
2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Target Version | long-term => |