PacketFence - BTS - PacketFence | |||||
| View Issue Details | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0001203 | PacketFence | performance | public | 2011-03-25 17:53 | 2011-10-25 09:03 |
| Reporter | obilodeau | ||||
| Assigned To | |||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | won't fix | ||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
| Product Version | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
| fixed in git revision | |||||
| fixed in mtn revision | |||||
| Summary | 0001203: Apache in worker mode instead of prefork | ||||
| Description | After looking more closely at what our default apache configuration file is doing, I realize that we can improve things. We are running apache in prefork mode where one process handles one request at a time (no threading). We should see if our code works fine in the worker mode. We could serve a lot more requests with the same amount of RAM consumed if it does work. On CentOS, the /usr/sbin/httpd.worker binary exists, I'm pretty sure that trying it and validating that the captive portal, the web admin and the Web Services back-end all work would be a good start. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | |||||
| Additional Information | |||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Relationships | |||||
| Attached Files | |||||
| Issue History | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
| 2011-03-25 17:53 | obilodeau | New Issue | |||
| 2011-03-25 21:39 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0002002 | |||
| 2011-04-04 17:18 | obilodeau | Note Added: 0002005 | |||
| 2011-04-04 17:18 | obilodeau | Status | new => closed | ||
| 2011-04-04 17:18 | obilodeau | Resolution | open => won't fix | ||
| 2011-10-25 09:03 | obilodeau | Target Version | +1 => | ||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||