PacketFence - BTS - PacketFence | |||||
| View Issue Details | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0001488 | PacketFence | core | public | 2012-07-12 13:35 | 2012-08-01 14:09 |
| Reporter | fgaudreault | ||||
| Assigned To | |||||
| Priority | low | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
| Product Version | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | 3.5.0 | |||
| fixed in git revision | |||||
| fixed in mtn revision | |||||
| Summary | 0001488: Have a new violation action 'close' | ||||
| Description | We have seen some use case where a violation could have to close another one, especially with MDM (Mobile Device Management). ie. You want to force a user to use a specific set of applications. While registering you open a violation "Missing App something", and when the app phone home, we open a new violation "Seen App Something". This new violation will come and close the first one allowing network access. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | |||||
| Additional Information | |||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Relationships | |||||
| Attached Files | |||||
| Issue History | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
| 2012-07-12 13:35 | fgaudreault | New Issue | |||
| 2012-07-12 15:20 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0002838 | |||
| 2012-07-19 11:11 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0002847 | |||
| 2012-08-01 14:09 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0002858 | |||
| 2012-08-01 14:09 | fgaudreault | Status | new => closed | ||
| 2012-08-01 14:09 | fgaudreault | Resolution | open => fixed | ||
| 2012-08-01 14:09 | fgaudreault | Fixed in Version | => 3.5.0 | ||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||