Notes |
|
|
Hello,
did you try tcmdump to see radius traffic ?
Also the error Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/web/dispatcher.pm line 56 is just a warning that mean there is no referer in the http headers.
Regards
Fabrice |
|
|
(0003361)
|
muhlig
|
2013-08-01 02:03
|
|
It seems to me radius.log entry "Auth: Login OK" says radius server was found and responded correctly - while register.cgi doesn't see any radius server. And this was inconsistent, wasn't it?
Warning, you say? I found it in portal_error.log and there was no indication of "warning" so I assumed this is an error :-)
However this is rather old issue and the snapshot is outdated already. I'm going to try this once more after 4.0.4 is released. |
|
|
|
I think in your setup you added a radius authentication source.
First you receive a radius request from your switch/access point and after on the captive portal packetfence try to check your username and password on your authentication source EBADAUTH.
So the problem is between packetfence and EBADAUTH it why i told you to sniff the radius traffic packetfence end EBADAUTH.
Fabrice |
|
|
(0003389)
|
muhlig
|
2013-08-07 07:00
(edited on: 2013-08-07 07:24) |
|
Radius authentication source is there indeed. Communication between packetfence and radius server also is correct. Real problem is packetfence rejecting otherwise previously correctly authenticated user. See attached log excerpt (in Attached Files).
+++[packetfence] returns reject
++- if (!EAP-Type || (EAP-Type != 21 && EAP-Type != 25)) returns reject
Looks like not-EAP message is invalid here. Any hint?
Best regards,
MU
|
|
|
(0003954)
|
lmunro
|
2015-02-18 11:07
|
|
Not a bug.
Don't use unsuported versions. |
|