PacketFence - BTS - PacketFence | |||||
| View Issue Details | |||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0000746 | PacketFence | public | 2009-07-13 17:00 | 2011-01-26 15:43 | |
| Reporter | obilodeau | ||||
| Assigned To | obilodeau | ||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | tweak | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
| Product Version | |||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
| fixed in git revision | |||||
| fixed in mtn revision | |||||
| Summary | 0000746: Captive portal favors Registration page over Violation page | ||||
| Description | If you have a node that is both unregistered and has a violation, the registration page is preferred over the violation one. I think it should be the opposite. For example, an OS that is banned should not be offered to register, it should be pretty clear that even before registration the OS is banned. Wondering if there could be any use case where the registration page could be preferred over violation page.. | ||||
| Steps To Reproduce | |||||
| Additional Information | |||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
| Relationships | |||||
| Attached Files | |||||
| Issue History | |||||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
| 2009-07-13 17:00 | obilodeau | New Issue | |||
| 2009-07-14 09:10 | obilodeau | Assigned To | => obilodeau | ||
| 2009-07-14 09:10 | obilodeau | Status | new => assigned | ||
| 2009-07-14 09:10 | obilodeau | Category | 1.8.3 => 1.8.4 | ||
| 2009-07-16 17:32 | obilodeau | Note Added: 0001292 | |||
| 2009-07-16 17:32 | obilodeau | Status | assigned => resolved | ||
| 2009-07-16 17:32 | obilodeau | Resolution | open => fixed | ||
| 2011-01-26 15:43 | obilodeau | Status | resolved => closed | ||
| Notes | |||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
||||